http://www.mediafire.com/?mnmjojmnojiI feel the need to nitpick your nitpicks.
Does that mean I can also deploy a follower to a castle tile as something else?
Why is the word "tile" (bolded by me) used there, when it's not used previously in the preceding paragraph after castle? Can you deploy a follower to the farm or city bits outside the castle as a baron? Or is the word tile not supposed to be there?
Does the baron (inside the castle) count for majority of the city or farm? Does the baron outside the castle (but still on the tile) count for majority?
I used the word tile because it is a tile, but since it confuses you I took it out. A baron is only a baron if he is inside the castle, so I'm not writing anything about barons outside castles.
"The followers in the surrounding city or farm become serfs to the baron."
So if I have a thief on a road next to the city or farm, they become serfs to the baron as well? Do you mean, the followers in the same city or farm as the castle instead?
I'm not sure why someone would think that a thief on a road could become a serf, since roads are not part of cities or farms. I used the word surrounding in terms of the city or farm that surrounds the castle, but since that confused you I took it out.
How are the total points for the cities and the farms still determined? There's no statement saying that it remains unchanged, or that it is the same as normal. And examples should be given in text form (e.g. city with 2 pennants score x for baron and y for serfs) if you can't do the picture form - it will make it more clear.
Wouldn't people expect it to be unchanged unless a statement is made that scoring is changed? I added a footnote to explicitly state that scoring is as usual, and I put some scoring examples towards the end.