avt104981
Vagabond
Merit: 0
 Offline
Posts: 3
|
 |
« Reply #285 on: February 04, 2009, 11:50:11 am » |
|
On page 112: "To raise the stakes of a challenge between shrines and cloisters, and to make it more worthwhile to risk the chance of getting no points, the winning challenger receives the points for both structures (9 + 9 = 18 points) while the loser still receives nothing. (Thanks to RationalLemming)."
It should either say "... the winning challenger receives double points for his/her structure (9x2 = 18)" or "the winning challenger receives the points for both structures" with no comments in parantheses, since if the challenge is won the other structure is definately not completed and cannot give 9 points. It can be anything like 9+6 or 9+7, but not 9+9.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
bufferm44
|
|
« Reply #286 on: February 05, 2009, 05:59:35 am » |
|
...if the challenge is won the other structure is definately not completed But the winner can complete both in one step with only on tile, can't he? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Lardarse
|
|
« Reply #287 on: February 05, 2009, 03:37:31 pm » |
|
If that happens, both players score 9 points in the normal rules for shrines as neither finished before the other did.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
avt104981
Vagabond
Merit: 0
Offline
Posts: 3
|
|
« Reply #288 on: February 06, 2009, 12:10:46 am » |
|
...if the challenge is won the other structure is definately not completed But the winner can complete both in one step with only on tile, can't he? "...IF THE CHALLENGE IS WON..." (see above). The challenge is not won if the winner completes both structures in one step since neither party finished first. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Nors
Cottager
Merit: 4
Offline
Posts: 20
|
|
« Reply #289 on: March 01, 2009, 04:00:30 pm » |
|
Do you know when the "Final 5.0" will be ready? (Can't wait to make a nice print of it  ) |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
mjharper
|
|
« Reply #290 on: March 01, 2009, 04:34:34 pm » |
|
Do you know when the "Final 5.0" will be ready? (Can't wait to make a nice print of it ) Soon, I promise. Have to go through a few corrections, and then... Maybe I'll have a little time next week. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Currently residing in the 'Where are they now?' file.
|
|
|
Nors
Cottager
Merit: 4
Offline
Posts: 20
|
|
« Reply #291 on: March 01, 2009, 04:38:57 pm » |
|
Sounds Great  Thanks for a exelent piece of work  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
rbilabronze
Vagabond
Merit: 0
Offline
Posts: 9
|
|
« Reply #292 on: March 01, 2009, 09:24:55 pm » |
|
Not sure if this should be noted by footnote as a possible difference in rules in latest CAR? I've posed this question in another thread as well. It has to do with the seduction token in catapult. I wasn't sure whether you can swap with the opponent's closest follower if the token lands closest to one of your own followers? It appears that HIG and Rio Grande Games may have different rules? The Rio Grande Rules state "If the token comes to rest on the map, then the players determine which opponent’s follower is closest to the token and may use the measuring board in case of doubt...." See: http://www.riograndegames.com/uploads/Game/Game_286_gameRules.pdf. The CAR (and I assume HIG) doesn't mention "opponent's" so it appears if it lands closest to your own follower you couldn't swap for an opponent's follower (but possibly your own if it would make sense to exchange for mayor, or big meeple, etc.). |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
McKatla
Vagabond
Merit: 0
Offline
Posts: 2
|
|
« Reply #293 on: March 30, 2009, 03:16:25 pm » |
|
Thank you for all your work on the CAR! It's really useful. I'm looking forward to reading the expanded version, but when I follow the link (or try to follow the drop down link to the downloads for members on the front page), I get redirected to a login page for mobile.me. I've tried both Safari and FireFox, with the same result. Can you please tell me what to do?
/Frank
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
McKatla
Vagabond
Merit: 0
Offline
Posts: 2
|
|
« Reply #294 on: March 30, 2009, 03:27:44 pm » |
|
I forgot to say that I've tried to login with the password I found on my profile page, but it does not work...
/Frank
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
scotty13
|
|
« Reply #295 on: March 30, 2009, 05:41:03 pm » |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Deatheux
|
|
« Reply #296 on: March 30, 2009, 06:52:54 pm » |
|
thanks for the link!!
great job camarade!!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
LCF = 57 + 3!!!
13 man on the field IS a penalty!!!!!(10 yards, automatic 1st down)
A match can never be ended on a defensive penalty!!!
|
|
|
Carbon
Vagabond
Merit: 0
Offline
Posts: 5
Looking forward to life
|
|
« Reply #297 on: May 11, 2009, 03:31:39 am » |
|
This is amazing - it makes adding new expansions a breeze - and stops family "discussions" when I pull out the TOME. Thank you  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
welverin
Vagabond
Merit: 0
Offline
Posts: 2
|
|
« Reply #298 on: May 28, 2009, 11:09:02 am » |
|
any news for the final version 5.0 of CAR ?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
PLAY PLAY PLAY
|
|
|
|
mjharper
|
|
« Reply #299 on: May 28, 2009, 11:30:25 am » |
|
any news for the final version 5.0 of CAR ?
Depends on how final people want it ;-) I mean, if all that needs to be done is go through and edit typos, I can probably have that done (fairly) soon. Any more than that—new FAQ, for example—would take considerably longer, since my time is limited at the moment... Thoughts? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Currently residing in the 'Where are they now?' file.
|
|
|
|
