Carcassonne Central
January 10, 2025, 04:01:32 am *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: THESE FORUMS HAVE BEEN REPLACED. PLEASE GO TO THE NEW FORUMS: http://www.carcassonnecentral.com/community/
 
   Home   Help Search Staff List Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Tower under bridge.  (Read 6480 times)
0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.
jcardwell3rd
Vassal
*****

Merit: 5
Offline Offline

Posts: 93


You can put it there if you want, you dont have to


WWW Awards
« on: August 03, 2011, 09:33:52 pm »

So there is that one tower piece with the tower base dead center. If I build a bridge over it does it block a tower from going over 1 level? What if the tower is already tall and I want to play the bridge? I assume the easy answer is to slide the tower over a little.
Logged

Cheers,
III

Could you place this for me? Over there. Nope, Spin, Spin, The other way. Over a little, little more. THERE!
Carcking
Authors
Marquis
*
***

Merit: 8
Offline Offline

Posts: 507


I call Red!


WWW Awards
« Reply #1 on: August 04, 2011, 05:24:44 am »

Heh, this is interesting. I hadn't considered that combination. We haven't played the Tower with Bridges, so we haven't had to cross that bridge  Grin

We would probably just slide the tower over...believing it would not be the intent of HiG for either to interrupt the other.
Logged

Who's your favorite? Knight, Thief, Farmer or Monk?

Find CC Fanspansions Here
CKorfmann
Authors
Duke Chevalier
*
*
*

Merit: 32
Offline Offline

Posts: 1807


Pigs are meeple too!


Awards
« Reply #2 on: August 04, 2011, 02:30:16 pm »

we haven't had to cross that bridge  Grin
Nice.

I'm not sure what the ruling on that might be, but I think I would side with logic on this one.  If one object blocks the path of another, you're kinda out of luck.
Logged

Flee the fleas!
Scott
Authors
Duke Chevalier
*
*
*

Merit: 45
Offline Offline

Posts: 1538


WWW Awards
« Reply #3 on: August 13, 2011, 10:39:38 am »

I agree with CKorfmann. The tower has to be on its foundation, and the bridge has to connect to the road, so neither can be moved to accomodate the other.
Logged

CKorfmann
Authors
Duke Chevalier
*
*
*

Merit: 32
Offline Offline

Posts: 1807


Pigs are meeple too!


Awards
« Reply #4 on: August 13, 2011, 10:51:41 pm »

I agree with CKorfmann. The tower has to be on its foundation, and the bridge has to connect to the road, so neither can be moved to accomodate the other.

At least not more than what would naturally fit under the bridge.
Logged

Flee the fleas!
Carcking
Authors
Marquis
*
***

Merit: 8
Offline Offline

Posts: 507


I call Red!


WWW Awards
« Reply #5 on: August 14, 2011, 10:05:50 am »

I agree with CKorfmann. The tower has to be on its foundation, and the bridge has to connect to the road, so neither can be moved to accomodate the other.

I have reconsidered this and now agree with CK. Whichever feature is there first trumps the other. Neither one is entitled to exist if the other is already there. If a bridge is built before the tower gets to section two then the tower is stopped at section one. If the tower if built to two sections the bridge cannot be built. This is a reasonable conclusion.
Logged

Who's your favorite? Knight, Thief, Farmer or Monk?

Find CC Fanspansions Here
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.16 | SMF © 2011, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!