In the above game I deliberately blocked completion of the huge city by playing the 4 sided piece elsewhere (top right of pic) as otherwise black would have beaten me (red) for the city.
The debate came at the end when my Dad (black) insisted that it could only be one city as only one piece could complete it (original + river only).
I was equally sure based on the rules that until such time as the 4 sided piece was played (which could not now happen) it remained as 3 separate cities, 2 1 tile cities and 1 10 tile city.
Could some one clarify which of us is correct?
I ask as despite having checked the FAQ my Dad says it doesn't address this issue as it is illogical for it to be more than 1 city as only one tile could complete it, I reckon it is logical according to the rules as a tactical blocking manouver.
Cheers,
HJ